Football Sports

Was bondsreglement correctly interpreted and followed? Occupation of tournai, Mouscron, on september 18, proceedings

c4625e50eac76f2e5a3b46bbafc3db91 - Was bondsreglement correctly interpreted and followed? Occupation of tournai, Mouscron, on september 18, proceedings

The Evocatiecommissie of the Royal Belgian Football association (belgian football association) on Tuesday 18 september (from 14h00) together to determine whether the acquittal for Wesley Moraes (Club Brugge), Mehdi Carcela (Standard), Eric Ocansey (Eupen) and Loris Brogno (Beerschot Wilrijk) in accordance with the bondsregels happened. Also the evocatieberoep of Mouscron against the suspension of defender Christophe Diedhiou is then treated.

Wesley, Carcela, Ocansey and Brogno were on August 25, in appeal, acquitted because the indicative table on which their prosecution was based was approved by the Pro League. That was again in conflict with the bondsreglement, making the remission, the only option was for the arbitration board Appeal. On control of Pro League chairman Marc Coucke, the Bondsparket however, evocatieberoep.

Mouscron drew then evocation in the criminal record around Diedhiou. The Senegalese defender was four days suspension on the basis of the contested indicative table. The Henegouwers feel disadvantaged, because Diedhiou in contrast to Wesley and co, however, his suspension properly finished.

The Evocatiecommissie bows not on the basis of the files, but will only assess whether the bondsreglement was correctly interpreted and followed.

In the case of Mouscron will be assessed or the rights of the defence were not violated. The Henegouwers believed in the validity of the indicative table, but the official approval of the Pro League was missing. That is a new element. It is up to the Evocatiecommissie to decide whether that fact is of such a nature that the original decision (four days suspension) must be changed.

Leave a Comment