News

Kim picks up the comparison with Qaddafi is not

14d39a288a14b7bfedd17d818f9626e2 - Kim picks up the comparison with Qaddafi is not

If the meeting between Trump and Kim Jong-un on 12 June will not continue, is that to a large extent the result of vigorous statements by top aides of the Us president.

The bright swinging back and forth between the United States and North Korea, are back with a vengeance.

The meeting on 27 april between Kim Jong-un and his South Korean colleague Moon Jae-in …

The bright swinging back and forth between the United States and North Korea, are back with a vengeance.

The meeting on 27 april between Kim Jong-un and his South Korean colleague Moon Jae-in on the 38th parallel created temporarily for the exchange of friendly diplomatic messages between Washington and Pyongyang. North Korea to let three Americans free years gevangenzaten. But now the planned summit meeting between Trump and Kim on 12 June in Singapore at becoming looser screws.

“We will not be on our knees fall so that the US with us would talk,” warned the North Korean deputy minister for Foreign Affairs Choe Son Hui. “We will also try to get them to terminate if they do not want to together. It depends on the behavior of the US if they meet us in a conference room or at a nuclear showdown.’

Libya-model

North Korea’s anger has been prompted by a statement by the American vice-president Mike Pence on Fox News. “As the president made clear, this will only end up like the Libya model, if Kim Jong-un decided to no deal to close,” said Pence. He referred to the overthrow in 2011 of the regime of Libyan leader Gaddafi, after western bombing. Qaddafi was shortly afterwards murdered by the rebels. Choe Son Hui spoke of ” ignorant and stupid comments that flow out of the mouth of the American vice-president’.

The concept of the ‘Libya model’ was for the first time a few weeks ago by John Bolton, the new national security adviser to Trump. Bolton, who is known as a hawk, and between 2001 and 2005, and deputy minister of Foreign Affairs under George W. Bush, referred to and agree on the dismantling of the Libyan nuclear programme by Gaddafi in 2003. After the invasion of Iraq decided by the then Libyan leader eggs for his money. Out of fear of the same fate to undergo, and Saddam Hussein, he delivered the material in that he had bought a nuclear weapon to develop.

One-sided dismantling

That requirement fell already in bad ground at the North Koreans. Bolton, who as minister of Bush an important role in the Libya deal has played, demanded the facto, North Korea’s unilateral dismantling of its nuclear program – including nuclear weapons available to Gaddafi in 2003 did not yet.

The North Koreans think when the word ‘kernontwapening ” earlier in a gradual process, in which the whole peninsula free of nuclear weapons is created (DS-28 april). That implies that in the U.S. water with the wine, since they arranged for planes and ships to South Korea to send nuclear equipped.

‘Regime change’

But then craned president Donald Trump, the notion of ‘Libya deal’. He was there for more than a week ago, implied that Kim Jong-un the same fate could suffer if Qaddafi if he will not deal with him.

Pence referred explicitly to the decision of Trump. On the question of whether or not a threat is interpreted could be, replied the American vice president on Fox News: “I think it’s more a fact’.

Thus emerges the ghost of ‘regime change’, where the government of George W. Bush after the attacks of 9/11 its hallmark of made. Also the threats in the beginning of the week with the ‘toughest sanctions in history’, to the address of Iran by US-minister of Foreign Affairs Mike Pompeo, can be read as a return of the Bush doctrine in Washington.

This can be almost no different than the appetite reduce with the North Koreans for their nuclear arsenal completely dismantle. The New York Times pointed out that the North Korean press agency in 2016, after a successful nuclear test, explicitly referred to the fate of Saddam Hussein and Qaddafi: “The history proves that powerful nuclear deterrence serves as the most treasured sword to aggression from the outside’. A nuclear weapon is and will remain the most solid life insurance of states who feel threatened by a third party.

Leave a Comment